Hello

I did not do a runner. I stand firm on the decision that I (we) have taken. To me, it is simple: Nathan has matured fast - from a rude, careless host, he has learned to show some sympathy for his guests (and for his chef/partner!) and it was nice to see that emerging maturity, sense of responsibility; at times he even looked sincere.

On the other hand, Chris’ attitude was at all times professional, and mature beyond his age; critical yet supportive of his partner Nathan, the kind of young man that I am always eager to work with - at Le Manoir aux Quat' Saisons or at Brasserie Blanc. Chris faltered at the last hurdle - it was the final.

So - I according to many, I (and my partners) have committed a serious error of judgement which is so obvious to see. Chris is a good cook and Nathan is a reformed character; they should be the winners. On the other hand, both JJ and James are disturbing characters, stereotypes accused of being annoying, arrogant, superficial, shallow... and ... JJ cannot cook. So how could RB choose a chef who cannot cook? This defies all common sense; it is as simple as that.

Then why should I choose them as my winners? Why did we not go into business with Nathan and Chris? They are young, they are supple, they have moved on, learned, they are hard working ... yes, I hear, but, really for me, they are too immature, unequipped for that journey. I know that the first pressures, the stress of a real business would quickly break down the delicate relationship of my young and willing partners. Chris has been strong and consistent, he is the lynch pin of the partnership; and all credit to him. Nathan improved but not nearly enough.

My winners are JJ and James

I know too well that they do not fit the image of the conventional couple: Chef Patron and Front of House Manager, and it sounds bizarre that I of all people should choose a chef who cannot cook.

But… they have many qualities that I revere: they are hard working, resilient , smart and they think on their feet. They have sound and mature business minds, they are creative and they form the strongest team by far. Driven and hugely enthusiastic - and they have a concept, "a raison d être". The weakness of JJ (cannot cook) will be swept away by his obvious talent: cocktail-making. His cooking may be naive but his taste is immaculate. He is after all one of the most talented young British professionals. Give me JJ and James for a month, full on at Le Manoir, and we will see, for a start.

My partners and I feel confident that we have made the right choice and we very much look forward to working with JJ and James. Sure, the "Restaurant" that we are about to create will no doubt be different from most - yes , it will probably be eventful, but I know for certain - it will not be boring!

PS Last night, we celebrated with the boys, friends and family. Later today, I would like to share with you a few surprising, hidden facets of JJ and James .

I will see you later.

RB